Shaft-sinking companies ranking

# Company $
1

Kiewit

USA
Products: Engineering, Mining, Tunneling, Shaft Sinking
10,283.00
2 1

Murray & Roberts

South Africa
Products: Engineering, Mining, Tunneling, Construction, Shaft Sinking
1,406.68
3 1

Herrenknecht

Germany
Products: Tunneling, Mining, Exploration
1,351.41
4

Redpath Mining

Canada
Products: Shaft Sinking, Tunneling, Engineering
5

Dumas

Canada
Products: Construction, Engineering, Mining, Shaft Sinking, Tunneling
6

HAZEMAG

Germany
Products: Manufacturing, Engineering
7

Thyssen Schachtbau

Germany
Products: Tunneling, Shaft Sinking, Mining
8

DTS Group

Ukraine
Products: Manufacturing, Engineering, Tunneling
9

Belgorkhimprom

Belarus
Products: Shaft Sinking, Exploration, Mining, Engineering, Tunneling
23.07
10

Shakhtspetsstroy

Russia
Products: Exploration, Engineering, Tunneling, Shaft Sinking
12.49
11 1

UMS Group

South Africa
Products: Tunneling, Exploration, Mining, Shaft Sinking, Engineering
12 1

US-30

Russia
Products: Exploration, Engineering, Tunneling
13 2

ERCOSPLAN

Germany
Products: Exploration, Mining, Engineering

Missing your company in the ranking?

If you think that your company should certainly be included in this ranking — reach out and tell us about your business providing relevant information.
Contact
Us

About this ranking

The ranking of shaft-sinking companies was prepared by the experts and editorial team of industrial media Fertilizer Daily.

The ranking provides insights for the customers and allows them to understand who are the relevant and functional contractors on the market who can offer shaft-sinking and mining services. Most often, the higher the company is in the ranking, the more high-quality service and products it can offer.

The ranking is based on a study of publicly available business indicators and news materials published in high-profile media. A number of factors influenced the company’s final position in the ranking, including the modernity of the company’s website, the ease of audition of its financial and production indicators, the company’s presence on social networks, and many others.

Fertilizer Daily editors analyzed and moderated the following nominee’s criteria:

  • revenue for 2018 with translation into USD at the stock-exchange rate actual on December 31, 2019;
  • net profit for 2018 with translation into USD at the stock-exchange rate actual on December 31, 2019;
  • EBITDA margin for 2019 (where available);
  • the average annual number of employees for 2019 (obtained from official or open sources);
  • revenue per employee for 2019.

In addition to quantitative indicators, a number of qualitative indicators were analyzed, allowing to assess how well the nominee companies communicate with other market players and their potential customers, including the analysis of:

  • corporate website of the company, including the mobile version of the site;
  • performance of the sales department, the availability, and relevance of product information on the company’s website;
  • thoroughness and frequency of work with the media;
  • presence on social networks and other communication platforms.